FL man shoots unarmed kid. Walks home, has a beer.

povol said:
What exactly is racist about quoting Chicago black on black murder stats. Is that somehow profiling. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

He was obviously mocking the black folks by typing in all black. Unless you see it some other way with some fancy BBS color scheme I'm not privy to.
 
flamed03r1 said:
Correct, they were advised that the law DID NOT APPLY to this case.
Click to expand...

And now Holder, like our steely friend, is going to go on a misguided campaign against stand your ground. Even the actual AG does not get that SYG did not apply to this case. I am sure an attack on the Castle Doctrine will follow.
 
Flex Axlerod said:
And now Holder, like our steely friend, is going to go on a misguided campaign against stand your ground. Even the actual AG does not get that SYG did not apply to this case. I am sure an attack on the Castle Doctrine will follow.
Click to expand...


I am willing to bet you are correct.

I saw a few articles on this earlier today...makes me absolutely furious. I'm at a loss for words with the antics these idiots continue to dish out.
 
jase said:
Ok i can see the first link, but that vid seems more like a protect than a riot. I'm i wrong? It was thought that there would be mass riots all over the country, I'm just not seeing that.
Click to expand...

Riots or protests, what do they expect to accomplish?
They got the trial that never should have happened, and now they are unhappy because it didn't produce the result they wanted.
So what are they looking for, what do they expect should happen as a result of street mobs?
Mob justice?
Is that the level they want to see the country sink to?
 
pickled egg said:
I don't think I ever heard it was a PF9. Are you sure? Cuz if so, the piece in my pocket just became a collector's item. :D
Click to expand...

130714-gun-hmed-7p.photoblog600.jpg


you mean collect dust? :D
 
Flex Axlerod said:
And now Holder, like our steely friend, is going to go on a misguided campaign against stand your ground. Even the actual AG does not get that SYG did not apply to this case. I am sure an attack on the Castle Doctrine will follow.
Click to expand...

brilliant strategy. eliminate the legality of self defense and you can make progress toward elimination of the 2nd ammendment.
 
Flex Axlerod said:
And now Holder, like our steely friend, is going to go on a misguided campaign against stand your ground. Even the actual AG does not get that SYG did not apply to this case. I am sure an attack on the Castle Doctrine will follow.
Click to expand...

As much as I disagree with SYG laws they are state laws and the Fed's need to stay out of it. But I don't doubt Acree's suspicions a bit and they make alot more sense to me.
 
In Your Corner said:
Riots or protests, what do they expect to accomplish?
They got the trial that never should have happened, and now they are unhappy because it didn't produce the result they wanted.
So what are they looking for, what do they expect should happen as a result of street mobs?
Mob justice?
Is that the level they want to see the country sink to?
Click to expand...

the new concept is called... social engineering. Brought to you by http://parkscrump.com/attorneys/jasmine-rand/ from http://parkscrump.com

According to Ms Rand... this duty of "social engineering" is far and above the duty of being an attorney. Now they (law firm above) are "boo hissing" the Jury's decision.
 
bodell said:
and guns should be illegal
Click to expand...

That is the Angle being worked now...did any of you see DiannSawyer last night...They sent out a person to buy an AK and a .50 Cal "Sniper Rifle"..."WEAPONS OF WAR"...that contribute to Deaths on Our Streets"..

There was no real story, they bought from private citizens..showed the transaction, and scary footage of guns in war use..It seems to be a lead up to a much larger story/adgenda.
 
Joe Morris said:
As much as I disagree with SYG laws they are state laws and the Fed's need to stay out of it. But I don't doubt Acree's suspicions a bit and they make alot more sense to me.
Click to expand...

I looked at how many states had SYG laws similar to FL. Its pretty much the whole country The opponents are saying it promotes "bravado"... oh really??
Im guessing these folks have never been in an unfair fight. So the loophole is instead of retreating someone might watch a Dirty Harry marathon and go hunting for bad scenarios? :confused:

:FL:
 
Last edited:
XFBO said:
Please, don't EVER reproduce.




How can you agree? Aren't you one of the guys saying GZ was the aggressor and willfully killed TM?

GZ should have just been KO'd or better yet DIE since he wanted to play crimewatch Blart......Right? Then we would have seen so much outrage over another senseless crime, right? ST would have still started a thread over some half white/Hispanic man being beat to death by a black male.........I mean that barely ever happens in Amerika, right?



:stupid:
Now, I'm going to take a shower. :D


Wanna know why no one gives your rants any weight? You can't even get the [legal] definition of 'stalking' correct, I insist that you go look it up before further use cuz otherwise, you just look ...... well, dumb.



God, make it stop!
So a gun owner/cc carrier loses the right to follow up suspicious activities simply because he's armed himself?!?!? Really, isn't that what you are saying???

So someone sees a crime against PROPERTY, whether it's his or not so what.....he has to run the opposite direction just in case one of the perps decides to confront him??? Then, if they begin to beat the living snot out of him, he can't shoot cuz he didn't run fast enough out of dodge?!?!? :rolleyes:


I swear some of you should learn about self aborting yourselves.
Click to expand...
LMFAO, this can't happen! I'll have to change my stance. Z-man is a cold blooded racist murderer.....:crackup::crackup:
 
Chaotic said:
Hey wait, tanks95......
Click to expand...

Hey Chaotic, this photo makes your point about the media / society and the photos they use. I mean, he looks HOT! in this photo. Such a nice kid....and he made the Rolling Stone. I mean did he REALLY do what they said he did? He looks sooooooo nice. Im crying right now......he's innocent. WOW. Next, Juror B37 will be on the cover of Playboy.

Tsarnaev-rolling-s_2619591b.jpg
 
Last edited:
Britt said:
That is the Angle being worked now...did any of you see DiannSawyer last night...They sent out a person to buy an AK and a .50 Cal "Sniper Rifle"..."WEAPONS OF WAR"...that contribute to Deaths on Our Streets"..

There was no real story, they bought from private citizens..showed the transaction, and scary footage of guns in war use..It seems to be a lead up to a much larger story/adgenda.
Click to expand...

I'll bet they cant site one case of homicide in the US involving a 50 caliber rifle.
 
TurboBlew said:
I looked at how many states had SYG laws similar to FL. Its pretty much the whole country The opponents are saying it promotes "bravado"... oh really??
Im guessing these folks have never been in an unfair fight. So the loophole is instead of retreating someone might watch a Dirty Harry marathon and go hunting for bad scenarios? :confused:

:FL:
Click to expand...

My principle issue with SYG is that it allows someone to escalate a situation and then use lethal force. That just strikes me as a bad idea. Even if that scenario is remote and unlikely the notion that it is permissible makes me think it's a bad law. My secondary issue is that SYG adds a layer of law to an area already covered. If you fear for your life you can use lethal force. The case in Sanford just proved it but that's not new either. Taking both objections at once I don't see what is gained by a SYG law but I do see a loophole created which I disagree with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top