Benghazi Covered Up Changing Sides in the War on Terror?

Jed said:
Is the basis of all this the 60 minute report with all the inaccuracies and the eye witness who wasn't really in the know but says he knew the RRF was ordered not to deploy?

The only conspiracy here is that the guys on the ground wanted to give their Libyan friends the benefit of the doubt which proved fatal. Shit goes wrong sometimes.
Click to expand...

It must be easy being you. The conversation witht he man in the mirror must be entertaining, if not simple.

I envy you. Maybe not.
 
Hawk518 said:
The debate is missing the root cause, the belief that is crucial to US deployment. No one left behind. This is not always practical. And we have clearly demonstrated the failture of the ideal by the many lives we have left behind in foreign lands and seas.

The issue that I have with Benghazi is that failed to keep our word. We never attempted to secured/protect our citizens.

The talking point and blaming of the video, well that is clear to see and only clouded by your agenda.
Click to expand...

It may be way worse than this; our ambassador may have been set up because he was a whistleblower....
 
Whatever you're taking isn't enough...

Or, it's really good shit and I'd really appreciate you sharing.;)
 
And where was the president during the attack, and why were they at a poorly protected site in a hostile area on the anniversary of 9/11?
 
sheepofblue said:
And where was the president during the attack, and why were they at a poorly protected site in a hostile area on the anniversary of 9/11?
Click to expand...
LOL, he was in the White House all whacked out on Coke. I actually read that somewhere...:D. It's amazing what you can find on the interwebs...
 
kangasj said:
LOL, he was in the White House all whacked out on Coke. I actually read that somewhere...:D. It's amazing what you can find on the interwebs...
Click to expand...

Sad that during such a rare international event as the murder of our ambassador that your joke as as much credence as other stories. An utter lack of solid information on both questions.
 
sheepofblue said:
Sad that during such a rare international event as the murder of our ambassador that your joke as as much credence as other stories. An utter lack of solid information on both questions.
Click to expand...
I really hope the select committee finds out what was going on.:up:
 
My favorite headline of the week so far was...

Benghazi Emails: Despite spin, not just a Fox story any more.

It was a headline for...

Wait for it...

...

Fox News...:beer:
 
We know that all you Obama lovers will continue to kick Fox News in the teeth for reporting on a story that the remaining Obama loving media will not talk much about but, ya gotta admit, it is a story worth pursuing. The administration, not wanting to be bothered with such mundane tasks as making sure that our embassies were protected when the 9/11 anniversary was coming up, ended up getting some people killed. They just didn't have the time to deal with it.

Most likely the biggest tug-of-war going on right now is the attempt to force Obama and his minions to admit that they fucked up and to stop trying to cover it up. The lying and coverup is what's getting Obama's tit in the wringer. But alas, that's his nature. He still thinks he's above it all. It continues to amaze me when I see people still supporting the lying sob.
 
mfbRSV said:
I'm sure the families of the 4 dead Americans are outraged by that. :rolleyes:

Were you afraid to post the link to the opinion piece, which is not headline news?

Here it is: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/05/02/benghazi-emails-despite-spin-not-just-fox-story-any-more/
Click to expand...

That's it!

I was afraid to post a link! I knew it was impossible to find the story if I just posted the headline word for word and said Fox.

13 hearings, 25,000 pages of documents and 50 briefings.

I get it, they crafted the talking points for political reasons, I am outraged, because I know that almost nobody except everyone crafts talking points for political reasons.

It's been covered to death, for... political reasons.


Clinton said"I take responsibility,"

It was about Obama at a point, that ship has sailed, it's about a presidential front-runner now who I believe will not run.

but hey, whatever floats your boat.:beer:
 
Orvis said:
We know that all you Obama lovers will continue to kick Fox News in the teeth for reporting on a story that the remaining Obama loving media will not talk much about but, ya gotta admit, it is a story worth pursuing. The administration, not wanting to be bothered with such mundane tasks as making sure that our embassies were protected when the 9/11 anniversary was coming up, ended up getting some people killed. They just didn't have the time to deal with it.

Most likely the biggest tug-of-war going on right now is the attempt to force Obama and his minions to admit that they fucked up and to stop trying to cover it up. The lying and coverup is what's getting Obama's tit in the wringer. But alas, that's his nature. He still thinks he's above it all. It continues to amaze me when I see people still supporting the lying sob.
Click to expand...

Ya got me, I voted for Obama, twice, more then that, I worked hard within the machine to assure his reelection.

Overall, he has been a huge, and I mean HUGE disappointment on a number of fronts, but I'd take him over Mitts again in a heartbeat. and as my RWNB sister in law who hates him more then Clinton (and who thought that was possible) states so well, damn we're making some money.:)

So yea, bottom line, he sucks, he has that in common with the rest of the beltway crowd.:)
 
lizard84 said:
Ya got me, I voted for Obama, twice, more then that, I worked hard within the machine to assure his reelection.

Overall, he has been a huge, and I mean HUGE disappointment on a number of fronts, but I'd take him over Mitts again in a heartbeat. and as my RWNB sister in law who hates him more then Clinton (and who thought that was possible) states so well, damn we're making some money.:)

So yea, bottom line, he sucks, he has that in common with the rest of the beltway crowd.:)
Click to expand...

As I've said before, and like you, I thought that Obama might just make a fairly good president even though I did not vote for him. He fell under the wheels of his own wagon early on and really has been a disappointment. On the other side of the equation is our girl Hillary. God help us if she gets into office. She's been dealing with political issues for a long time and she knows how to get things done. Obama is a piker compared to her.
 
So all that great data sir lizard then you can answer my previously posted questions

1 what they there and on the anniversary of 9/11?

2 where was Obama?
 
lizard84 said:
That's it!

I was afraid to post a link! I knew it was impossible to find the story if I just posted the headline word for word and said Fox.

13 hearings, 25,000 pages of documents and 50 briefings.

I get it, they crafted the talking points for political reasons, I am outraged, because I know that almost nobody except everyone crafts talking points for political reasons.

It's been covered to death, for... political reasons.


Clinton said"I take responsibility,"

It was about Obama at a point, that ship has sailed, it's about a presidential front-runner now who I believe will not run.

but hey, whatever floats your boat.:beer:
Click to expand...

Lizard, it's about right & wrong....to me anyways
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top